LIC Gets 10 Yrs to Meet Public Holding Norm

SEBI’s Decision Regarding LIC’s Minimum Public Shareholding Norms and Its Impact

Analysis for a Layman

The recent news pertains to the relaxation of a regulatory requirement for LIC (Life Insurance Corporation of India), a government-owned insurance and investment company, by SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), the regulatory body for India’s stock markets.

SEBI has a rule called the Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) norm, which requires companies that have gone public (listed their shares on stock exchanges) to have a minimum percentage of their shares held by public shareholders (retail and institutional investors). Currently, this norm mandates that at least 25% of a company’s shares should be held by the public.

In the case of LIC, the government of India holds a significant majority of its shares, specifically 96.5%. To meet the MPS norm, LIC would need to reduce the government’s ownership to 75%, which requires selling a substantial portion of its shares to the public.

SEBI has granted LIC an exemption or relaxation, allowing it 10 more years to meet this norm. Typically, companies are required to meet this norm within three years of their listing, but LIC now has until May 2032.

LIC Gets 10 Yrs to Meet Public Holding Norm

Impact on Retail Investors

For individual investors in the stock market, this decision means that LIC will not be required to sell a significant portion of its shares to the public in the near term. While this might seem like a relief, it has both positive and negative implications.

Positive Impact:

  • The delay in selling shares to the public provides LIC with more time to improve its financial performance, potentially leading to a better valuation when the shares are eventually sold.
  • LIC is a major institutional investor in various industries. A stable and well-performing LIC is generally considered positive for the overall market sentiment.
  • Retail investors may not see immediate benefits, but they have more time to evaluate LIC as a potential investment when the stake sale eventually occurs.

Negative Impact:

  • The government’s prolonged ownership of LIC can influence investment decisions, potentially prioritizing social goals over financial returns.
  • High government ownership can limit minority investors’ ability to influence the company’s strategy, which may result in limited upside for retail investors.
  • As the government gradually divests its stake in LIC over the next 10 years, it could create an overhang in the stock market, potentially depressing LIC’s valuation and stock price performance during this period.

Investors should consider these factors when evaluating the impact of this exemption on their investment decisions related to LIC over the next decade.

Impact on Industries

The insurance and investment industry, particularly in India, will be most affected by this decision. LIC is one of the largest institutional investors in Indian markets, and its investment strategy can influence various sectors.

Positive Impact:

  • A stable LIC with a longer time frame for stake sale could pursue investments that align with government priorities, such as infrastructure and manufacturing, even if the financial returns are lower. This could benefit sectors related to government initiatives.
  • Sectors that have major public and private companies falling under LIC’s investment universe may see continued buying support. Examples include banking, healthcare, and consumer goods.

Negative Impact:

  • LIC’s investments driven by social goals rather than economic rationale can lead to misallocation of capital, negatively impacting industry growth and returns.
  • Lack of transparency or clarity regarding LIC’s investment strategy over the next decade can create uncertainty and affect sector-specific insights for investors.

Investors in various industries should closely monitor LIC’s investment approach and strategy to assess potential benefits or drawbacks.

Long-Term Benefits and Negatives

Over the long term, this decision provides LIC with an extended period to meet the MPS norms, which has both advantages and disadvantages.


  • LIC can use this time to strengthen its balance sheet, improve financial performance, and expand into new insurance segments, ultimately enhancing its competitiveness.
  • The government can plan a staggered divestment program based on market conditions, leading to a more optimal realization of value from its stake sale.


  • Minority shareholders may have limited influence over LIC’s management and may not ensure prudent management during this period.
  • There is a risk that LIC’s investment decisions continue to prioritize social goals over financial returns, leading to lower returns on equity.
  • LIC’s dominance in the insurance sector may hinder its ability to match private competitors in terms of governance and performance culture.

Investors should consider these factors while assessing the long-term impact of this exemption on LIC and the insurance sector as a whole.

Short-Term Benefits and Negatives

In the short term (3-5 years), this decision offers stability for LIC, particularly during uncertain market conditions. A quick divestment to meet the MPS norm could have depressed valuations and caused immediate disruptions.


  • LIC’s stability is crucial in volatile market conditions, and this exemption helps maintain that stability.
  • It allows LIC to retain management control, reducing immediate disruption from leadership changes.


  • There may be a focus on policyholder payouts and social objective investing due to government ownership, which could negatively impact profitability.
  • Minority shareholders may face corporate governance issues arising from inadequate public float, potentially leading to a languishing stock price.

Investors should consider these short-term benefits and negatives while evaluating LIC as an investment in the current market environment.

In conclusion, SEBI’s decision to grant LIC a 10-year exemption from meeting the Minimum Public Shareholding norm has various implications for retail investors, industries, and the long-term and short-term prospects of LIC. Investors should carefully weigh the pros and cons of this decision when making investment decisions related to LIC and monitor LIC’s strategies and performance over the coming years.

Potential Beneficiaries:

  • LIC itself: The extended timeframe gives LIC more flexibility to plan and execute its divestment strategy without immediate pressure to sell shares, potentially allowing for better price realization and minimizing market impact. This could have a positive influence on its future earnings and market valuation.
  • Indian retail investors: The additional time offers them a longer window to participate in future LIC equity offerings, potentially increasing retail access to a significant financial institution.
  • Government of India: By delaying the divestment, the government can benefit from any potential future increase in LIC’s share price, leading to greater capital value upon eventual sale. This could benefit various government programs and initiatives.

Potential Impacted Sectors:

  • Private Life Insurance Companies: The extended focus on LIC might temporarily divert investor attention from smaller private players in the life insurance sector, potentially impacting their short-term trading volumes and valuations.
  • Mutual Funds and Portfolio Managers: Funds with significant holdings in LIC may need to adjust their portfolios and investment strategies in light of the extended holding period, impacting their short-term performance.

Market Sentiment:

  • Mixed Sentiment: The news might lead to mixed sentiment in the Indian stock market. While LIC could benefit from the flexibility, some investors might perceive the delayed divestment as a negative signal for government’s commitment to privatization, potentially impacting broader market sentiment.
  • Increased Focus on LIC: The extended timeframe keeps LIC in the spotlight, potentially attracting sustained investor interest and analysis of its future performance and divestment plans.

Remember, this analysis is based on limited information and the actual impact on market sentiment and specific sectors will depend on various factors like future government policies, overall market conditions, and LIC’s own performance. Conducting further research and considering broader economic and market trends is crucial before making investment decisions based on this news.

Source: ET Bureau, “LIC Gets 10 Yrs to Meet Public Holding Norm,” Dec 22, 2023.

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top

Subscribe to Profitnama to access all articles, explanations, stock analysis
Already a member? Sign In Here