ProfitNama

ProfitNama

Large Multinationals in India Prepare for 15% Minimum Taxes under OECD Rules

Large Multinationals in India Prepare for 15% Minimum Taxes under OECD Rules

Large Multinationals in India Prepare for 15% Minimum Taxes under OECD Rules

Analysis for Layman

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has mandated a minimum 15% tax rate for large multinational corporations (MNCs) operating globally. The Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) regulation aims to prevent tax avoidance by restricting income shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.

Over 175 MNCs in India, with a global turnover exceeding ₹750 million, are proactively examining their tax structures ahead of the impending implementation of these guidelines in India. The rules have already taken effect in some countries from January 1, 2024, necessitating extensive data collection and tax planning revisions by companies.

Since India’s tax rates surpass 15%, the local revenue impact is expected to be minimal. However, MNCs directing investments through countries with lower rates may face additional taxes in their home country. This global tax harmonization drive led by the OECD aims to deter tax avoidance by large corporations.

Impact on Retail Investors

For retail investors in Indian branches of global MNCs, the BEPS 2.0 guidelines are unlikely to have an immediate impact on local financials or stock prices. India’s tax rates already exceed the 15% threshold, ensuring no additional payments eroding profits.

Nevertheless, structures involving intermediate holding jurisdictions with lower levies may trigger extra taxes abroad, impacting consolidated earnings. Investors are advised to seek clarification from managements during quarterly calls on such instances, as ultimate parent entities may face increased tax liabilities, potentially causing minor indirect sentiment spillover.

Fundamentally, the standardization of transfer pricing rules globally aims to reduce distortions and promote transparency, benefiting responsible corporates adhering to arms-length allocation norms over the long run.

Impact on Industries

Key industries affected by the OECD’s global minimum tax rules:

Information Technology:

Top outsourcing firms may assess overseas operational presence for compliance impact. Additional country-specific reporting and disclosures are likely.

Automobiles:

MNC carmakers using intermediary import holding companies in tax-friendly locations may need to reassess supply chain structures.

Oil & Gas:

Integrated energy giants’ trading arms and global in-house banking centers will quantify exposure as revenues are reallocated jurisdictionally.

Management Consultancies:

Global strategy firms supporting BEPS 2.0 readiness programs will witness heightened demand for tax advisory on modeling country scenarios.

While limited bottom-line impact is anticipated locally, ripple effects on systems, data flows, and filings are expected from mandated standard process adherence under the harmonized tax regime by OECD members.

Long-Term Benefits & Negatives

Positives:

  • Discourages tax arbitrage and profit shifting, improving contributions to national exchequers.
  • Enhances transparency on geographical profit breakup and cash taxes paid for investors.
  • Reduces distortions between compliant and non-compliant MNCs, fostering a level playing field over time.

Negatives:

  • Risk of over-taxation if coordinating mechanisms between countries lag.
  • Short-term growth headwinds for some developing markets as capital flows get reoptimized.
  • Continued lobbying by MNCs for threshold hikes, exemptions, etc.

Effectiveness depends on uniform interpretation and application across borders, but it is considered a welcome step.

Short-Term Benefits & Negatives

Positives:

  • Increased demand for tax and legal advisory on restructuring and compliance support.
  • Growth in data gathering and solution configuration contracts for ERP majors like SAP and Oracle.

Negatives:

  • Diversion of management bandwidth from business operations to tax scenario planning.
  • Increased compliance costs for firms below current thresholds if exemptions are diluted later.

For India specifically, the initiative signals to retain tax stability and consistency to attract foreign capital. It also serves as an impetus for taxation process digitization, encompassing filings, assessments, and administration. While the principles are sound, the rapid pace of change makes adaptation convoluted, with incentives realigning gradually to prevent gaming and erosion of developing country tax bases.

Companies Impacted by Global Minimum Tax in India

Indian Companies:

Less Impacted:

  • Large Indian Manufacturing Companies: Companies like Tata Motors, Reliance Industries, and L&T, with domestic manufacturing and relatively high effective tax rates in India, are unlikely to face additional tax burdens under Pillar Two. This could potentially improve investor confidence and stock prices.
  • Indian Technology Companies: Companies like Infosys and TCS, with significant domestic revenue and intellectual property ownership, might also see limited impact. Some subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions could face adjustments, but overall impact might be neutral.

Potentially Impacted:

  • Indian MNCs with Low-Tax Subsidiaries: Companies like Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories or Cipla, with overseas subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions, might face increased tax liabilities for those entities, impacting consolidated profits. This could lead to downward pressure on stock prices.
  • Indian Companies in Transfer Pricing Disputes: Companies with transfer pricing arrangements under scrutiny might face higher scrutiny and possible adjustments, leading to potential tax liabilities and impacting profitability.

Global Companies:

Gaining:

  • Governments of High-Tax Jurisdictions: Increased tax collection from large multinationals could benefit countries like the US and European nations, potentially leading to higher government spending and economic growth. This could positively impact companies reliant on government contracts or infrastructure spending.
  • Consulting Firms and Technology Providers: Companies specializing in tax compliance and data management could see increased demand for their services from MNEs preparing for Pillar Two implementation.

Losing:

  • Global Companies Reliant on Tax Optimization Strategies: Companies heavily reliant on low-tax havens and aggressive transfer pricing may face significant profit adjustments and higher tax bills, impacting shareholder returns and potentially leading to negative market sentiment.
  • Countries with Low-Tax Regimes: Countries like Ireland and Singapore, relying on low corporate tax rates to attract foreign investment, might see reduced attractiveness for MNEs, potentially impacting their economies.

Disclaimer:

This analysis is based on the information provided in the news article and should not be considered financial advice. It is recommended to conduct thorough research and consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top

Subscribe to Profitnama to access all articles, explanations, stock analysis
Already a member? Sign In Here